Some places are more likely than others to be vandalized. Small roadside boutiques selling various crafts or baked goods are prime targets, but strip clubs need not fear being ransacked. The kinds of people who would vandalize are probably the kinds of people who would enjoy getting smashed and a lap dance. But they might also be the kinds of people who would be more prone than others to get into argument with the bartender or doorman or owner of the establishment over something like limits on drinking, and this argument could motivate them to vandalize the club at a later date. This would probably only happen if there were another club they could subsequently frequent, since after vandalizing club #1 they would not be allowed back and their addiction to paying for flesh touch would require they continue the practice. The headache of looking for a strip club #2 could be avoided if their manner of vandalizing club #1 had been stealthy and discreet, in which case the vandal’s identity would not be known. This is unlikely, however, because we are talking here about someone who gets into argument with the staff of the establishment they frequent. A person such as this is most probably impulsive and incapable of being discreet. One of the side effects of being impulsive in the vandalism is that they probably would not have sought out in advance a second club to run to after bashing the first. If there were no club #2, they would seek to continue frequenting club #1, in order that their addiction be satisfied. But this would not be possible because, for reasons previously explained, their identity would be known to match that of the vandal.